Design
History
Ian Atherton took over
responsibility for the design and layout of the Field Guide in May
2006. He produced a range of potential designs for both the species
account pages and for the book cover. These were made available
on this website in order for BBS members to have an opportunity
to provide feedback. Ian also gave a presentation at the BBS conversazione
meeting in Hatfield in Autumn 2006. Many thanks to all members who
contributed comments and suggestions. A number of new features were
incorporated in response to the feedback which will serve to enhance
the usefulness of the book. Some of the main points raised both
at the Hatfield conversazione and by email are summarized below.
Inside pages
The final design for
the species accounts was based on "design 2" which was
a clear favourite with 80% of members. The use of the shaded margins
for the maps, drawings and subheadings was popular, as was the single
large and clear photograph. One of the most popular features of
this design was the annotation of the photographs and leaf drawings.
This was thought by several people to be very important, especially
for beginners. However, the use of bold text to emphasize parts
of the text was not popular.
An idea that came from
the membership that has been incorporated is to include order names
at the top of the page in colour-coded tabs. As well as helping
beginners to learn how taxa are grouped, this will also aid navigation.
A list of relevant NVC categories may also be introduced for some
species.
A few other minor alterations
have been made to the original design. The text area is slightly
wider, the green stripes have been replaced with neutral 4-colour
grey bars to avoid clashes with the order tabs, the authors' and
photographers' names will be cited in the margin, unless they request
otherwise, and scale bar dimensions now sit directly on the scale
bars, all making the pages cleaner.
Cover
Members' preferences
for the cover were much less focussed on one design. Overall the
'modern' designs took roughly 60% of the votes over the more traditional
designs. Even some of those who stated that they preferred the 'classic
look' did comment that they wouldn't throw any of the more modern
designs out. There was a strong sense that the more up-to-date approach
for the cover was attractive to the members and that we need to
move away from traditional designs so that the book has some impact.
The use of a mossy scene
rather than individual species was well received and was felt to
be more appealing to beginners who would be invited in by this,
rather than put off by the look of 'difficult bryophytes' on the
cover. Many members commented that black and/or white were not good
colours for the cover of a field guide. In the end the most popular
design overall was design 9, and it is a slightly modified version
of this which is presented here. The image
used on this cover is not necessarily the final image that will
be used on the published book.
Once again, thank you
to all members who took the time to contribute their thoughts on
the designs. Many of your suggestions that did not relate directly
to the design of the book have been noted and will be considered
in due course.
|